[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Omaha.pm] CGI.pm start_form() bug? I guess not...

To: <omaha-pm@pm.org>
Subject: Re: [Omaha.pm] CGI.pm start_form() bug? I guess not...
From: "Jay Hannah" <jhannah@omnihotels.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2005 14:34:39 -0500
Delivered-to: mailman-omaha-pm@mailman.pm.dev
Delivered-to: omaha-pm@pm.org
In-reply-to: <200507122106.j6CL6Mid015663@omares-email.omnihotels.com>
List-archive: <http://mail.pm.org/pipermail/omaha-pm>
List-help: <mailto:omaha-pm-request@pm.org?subject=help>
List-id: "Perl Mongers of Omaha, Nebraska USA" <omaha-pm.pm.org>
List-post: <mailto:omaha-pm@pm.org>
List-subscribe: <http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/omaha-pm>, <mailto:omaha-pm-request@pm.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/omaha-pm>, <mailto:omaha-pm-request@pm.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Reply-to: "Perl Mongers of Omaha, Nebraska USA" <omaha-pm@pm.org>
Thread-index: AcWHE/ceedZ8U1VpTyOfydtG2MophQAEZibwASpvCZA=

From: Kenn [mailto:kthompson@omnihotels.com] 
> Isn't this (http://tinyurl.com/8yvs8) essentially saying you can both parse
> the query string AND read the form post vars?

Indeed. Good catch. It appears that that author and the author of CGI.pm disagree. Perhaps it is a CGI.pm bug after all? I'm too lazy to look and see what w3c.org has to say about mixing POST and querystrings...

j

Prev by Date: [Omaha.pm] Mtg! Thr 7/21 7pm
Next by Date: [Omaha.pm] grep hack. better? worse? (faster?)
Previous by thread: [Omaha.pm] CGI.pm start_form() bug? I guess not...
Next by thread: Re: [Omaha.pm] [pm_groups] Getting To Know You
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread